Swiss law rules that the ultimate beneficial owners of a Swiss corporation must be disclosed to the company. Parliament recently enacted a revision of the disclosure provisions, streamlining the notification obligations and providing stricter penalties for non-compliance. This article outlines the notification obligations for Swiss corporations with registered shares, when either the target company or the acquirer is listed or when the target company has issued its shares as registered securities.
In 2020 Parliament passed a law to incorporate crypto assets and digital ledger technologies into Swiss law. This article focuses on the practical implementation of the recent changes to the Code of Obligations which provide for the introduction of ledger-based securities. This new form of dematerialised security enables the digitalisation and tokenisation of rights and financial instruments and digital transfers based on blockchain technology.
The UK Financial Conduct Authority will stop supporting the London Interbank Offered Rate at the end of 2021. According to the National Working Group on Swiss Franc Reference Rates, the Swiss Average Rate Overnight is the proposed replacement standard. This article explores the challenges that the transition period poses for national and global market participants.
The Federal Tribunal recently rendered a decision in a dispute between a bank and its client, a company, with regard to a (discretionary) wealth management contract. The claimant sought damages from the bank for a loss relating to the performance of the contract. This decision serves as a reminder of the fundamental issues of substantive law and gives food for thought in terms of the legal and strategic approaches to resolving a conflict.
The Financial Institutions Act came into force on 1 January 2020. It is crucial that the top management bodies of independent and external investment managers which manage the portfolios of individuals recognise whether a licensing obligation exists and whether appropriate measures must be initiated, as they are responsible for compliance with and the implementation of licensing obligations.
Swiss law rules that the ultimate beneficial owners of a Swiss corporation must be disclosed to the company. However, in a typical private equity structure, the economic ownership rights on the one hand and the management and control rights over the portfolio companies on the other hand usually fall apart, making it difficult to identify one or more typical beneficial owners. To remedy practical deficiencies and provide for greater legal security, Parliament recently enacted a revision of the disclosure provisions.
It has become increasingly clear that after the initial shock caused by the COVID-19 lockdowns, businesses will face lasting challenges. Against this background, a growing number of investors will need to assess how to deal with distressed business units or entire companies. This article provides an overview of corporate and financial reorganisation options, particularly with regard to the sale of distressed companies or business units and carve-out transactions.
As the Corporate Responsibility Initiative was rejected, an indirect counterproposal will likely enter into force, introducing reporting duties for companies of public interest and due diligence duties for companies active in certain high-risk areas. The potential penalties and liability, and the potential reputational risks stemming from violations of these duties, are relevant for the acquisition of or investments in Swiss companies. Thus, the counterproposal will affect due diligence in M&A and financing transactions.
In June 2020 the legislature passed draft modifications of Swiss corporate law, which would amend, among other things, substantial parts of the Code of Obligations. This marked the end of what is generally known as the 'large corporate law reform' which officially started in 2007. As part of these 'final' modifications, the provisions concerning the reduction of the share capital of Swiss corporations will be amended.
The Takeover Board recently confirmed its case law on whether the obligation to make a public takeover offer may be fulfilled by completing a merger. However, the Takeover Board's arguments were based heavily on the specifics of the case at hand. It seems possible, if not likely, that the Takeover Board would have come to a different conclusion had the merger been structured differently.
Over the past two years, patent owners have frequently limited patents in suit during infringement proceedings in Switzerland. Two recent Federal Supreme Court decisions have illuminated how and at what stage in the patent proceedings limitations are possible. While bringing some long-awaited clarity, the recent case law also raises new questions and issues for patent owners to consider in determining their litigation strategy.
Is an animated lung on the display of a ventilator machine merely an unpatentable display of information or a technical feature that can provide an inventive step? For the first time, the Federal Supreme Court recently addressed the issue of whether such graphical user interfaces can be technical and affirmed a Federal Patent Court's decision.
The Federal Council recently published a preliminary draft of a revised version of the Patent Act which would introduce a fully fledged patent system. As is well known, Switzerland is not a member of the planned unitary EU patent system comprising a European patent with unitary effect and the Unified Patent Court, so a revision of the Swiss patent system could make sense in this context.