Sweden updates

Arbitration & ADR

Contributed by Norburg & Scherp Advokatbyrå
Jura novit curia in Swedish arbitration
  • Sweden
  • November 16 2017

The Svea Court of Appeal recently rejected City Säkerhet's motion to set aside an arbitral award. The judgment clarifies whether an arbitrator's application of a legal rule to which neither party referred in the arbitration may constitute grounds to challenge the arbitration award. The principle of jura novit curia (ie, the court knows the law), which is applicable in court proceedings, should also apply in Swedish arbitration unless otherwise agreed by the parties.

Supreme Court clarifies doctrine of connection
  • Sweden
  • May 11 2017

The Supreme Court recently allowed for court proceedings despite a valid arbitration agreement between the parties, because the legal grounds invoked by the claimant were outside the scope of the arbitration agreement. The court confirmed the doctrine of assertion and clarified the doctrine of connection.

Energy Charter Treaty award upheld in challenge proceedings
  • Sweden
  • February 16 2017

The Svea Court of Appeal recently rejected the Republic of Kazakhstan's request to declare invalid or set aside the arbitral award in Stati v Kazakhstan. In the award, a group of foreign investors was awarded substantial damages following the state's seizure of certain assets. The judgment indicates that it is possible to declare an arbitral award based on false evidence invalid due to public policy, provided that it is proven that the outcome of the case was influenced.

Public policy in enforcement proceedings
  • Sweden
  • December 22 2016

Sweden's arbitration-friendly approach has led the Swedish courts to deny only rarely an application for the recognition and enforcement of a foreign award. It was therefore noted with interest when the Svea Court of Appeal denied enforcement of a foreign award due to matters of public policy in Finants Collect v Heino Kumpula.

Amendment of procedural orders in arbitration
  • Sweden
  • October 27 2016

Although arbitral tribunals have wide discretion to decide on the conduct of arbitral proceedings, it has frequently been debated whether a procedural order can reflect an agreement between the parties and, therefore, that the arbitral tribunal cannot amend such an order without exceeding its mandate or otherwise committing a procedural error. Two recent Svea Court of Appeal judgments have clarified these issues.


Contributed by Advokatfirman Törngren Magnell
Financial Supervisory Authority continues efforts to reduce household debts
  • Sweden
  • December 22 2017

The Financial Supervisory Authority recently agreed on more stringent amortisation requirements for home mortgages. The debt burden on Swedish households has long been a concern for regulators, and the authority is now taking an activist approach in an effort to mitigate the risk of a widespread crisis in case of a downturn in the housing market.

Supreme Court decides on enforceability of electronic promissory notes
  • Sweden
  • December 15 2017

A case regarding the enforceability of an electronic promissory note was recently decided by the Supreme Court. The court investigated whether the relevant electronic loan document was to be viewed as a non-negotiable or negotiable instrument, and settled that it was indeed a non-negotiable promissory note. This meant that the requirement to present an original document to the Enforcement Authority did not apply.

Joint and several liability between debtors and effect of creditor's actions
  • Sweden
  • March 17 2017

The Supreme Court recently clarified how to interpret joint and several liability when the creditor settles with one of the debtors and simultaneously releases that party from any future claims. The court concluded that the foundation of a joint and several liability between debtors is that the debtor that repays more than its pro rata share of a loan has a right to recover and claim the exceeding amount from the other debtor or debtors.

'Sufficient information' in creditworthiness assessment for consumer credits
  • Sweden
  • December 09 2016

Consumer credit may be granted only after the creditor has assessed the consumer's creditworthiness. The assessment must be based on sufficient information, as stipulated in the EU Credit Directive and the Consumer Credit Act. However, neither the directive nor the act defines 'sufficient information'. In a recent Administrative Court case, the Consumer Agency argued that a creditworthiness assessment based on details from a creditor's scoring model did not give sufficient information.

Update on new legislation
  • Sweden
  • August 26 2016

The government recently issued directives for a commission of inquiry to analyse the market for crowdfunding and peer-to-peer lending. As Sweden has yet to introduce regulations that explicitly address crowdfunding platforms or peer-to-peer lending, the directives contain instructions to consider which laws apply to the different forms of crowdfunding and whether new legislation and penalties are required.

Company & Commercial

Reversed burden of proof when appellate court rules on alleged loan
  • Sweden
  • May 22 2017

According to case law, a party is entitled to reclaim transfers of funds if it is undisputed that the transfer has occurred and the transferee has failed to provide sufficient evidence that he or she is entitled to keep the funds. This general rule was recently disputed in a case regarding several transfers of funds from one business partner to another acting in a joint development project.

Competition & Antitrust

Contributed by Advokatfirman Lindahl
Competition Authority receives greater decision-making powers
  • Sweden
  • November 02 2017

After years of intense debate, a new government bill will give the Competition Authority greater decision-making powers in relation to notified mergers in Sweden. An official government report states that the authority's decision-making powers should lead to an increased incentive for fast, high-quality decision making and eliminate time losses that might arise as a result of the authority preparing a lawsuit instead of a decision.

Employment & Benefits

Contributed by Wistrand
Delimitation between employment and consultancy agreements
  • Sweden
  • January 10 2018

Companies and individuals acting on the Swedish labour market should be aware of the delimitation in law between consultants and employees. Whether an individual is to be considered a company consultant or an employee will determine the applicability of employment protection and could have significant tax implications affecting both companies and private individuals.

Expanded rights for Swedish trade unions to act against foreign companies
  • Sweden
  • September 13 2017

The legislature recently amended the law known as 'Lex Laval', according to which the right to conduct collective actions against foreign labour stationed in Sweden has been limited. The amendments in Lex Laval, which entered into force in June 2017, bring expanded rights for Swedish trade unions through collective actions by demanding that workplaces with foreign labour be covered by Swedish collective agreements.

Labour Court rules on compensation for damages
  • Sweden
  • May 24 2017

Calculating compensation for damages can be complicated. The Labour Court recently ruled on this matter and made three individuals and their company liable to pay damages of several million Swedish kroner. It is the first case of its type and magnitude to be tried by a court of the highest instance. The Supreme Court has also decided that the dispute in question is a labour dispute, not a civil claims case.

Introduction of statutory protection for whistleblowers
  • Sweden
  • March 01 2017

Following the government's recent finding that whistleblower protection must be improved, new legislation has entered into force. The new legislation has given Sweden its first act specifically on whistleblowing. While the Whistleblowing Act does not regulate any right for employees to blow the whistle about wrongdoing, it protects employees and temporary workers who report serious wrongdoings in their employer's business from retaliation.

Trade union liable when in violation of European Convention on Human Rights
  • Sweden
  • September 14 2016

The Supreme Court has ruled that under certain conditions a trade union may be liable for damages if industrial action has taken place in violation of the European Convention on Human Rights. Previously, the general opinion was that employers' organisations and trade unions could not be liable for such damage claims. The decision is particularly significant for small companies, which are more affected by such industrial action.