Hungary updates

Company & Commercial

Registering a security agent in the company register: a technical solution
  • Hungary
  • May 16 2016

If a security agent is not appointed before the conclusion of a quota pledge agreement, but the agreement is signed by several pledgees, these pledgees are still entitled to appoint a security agent. However, the Civil Code stipulates that the appointment becomes effective only when the pledgee has been registered as a security agent in the relevant register. This can be problematic, as there is no section on the electronic registration form for doing so.

Forced termination procedure: key aspects
  • Hungary
  • March 28 2016

Under Hungarian law, companies closing their business year on December 31 must publish their annual financial report on or before the following May 31. If a company repeatedly delays performing this obligation, the tax authority will withdraw the company's tax number and inform the competent registration court accordingly. A situation can thus quickly be reached where there are slim chances of keeping the company alive.

Competition & Antitrust

Contributed by Schoenherr Attorneys at Law
HCA uses new investigative tool under merger control regime
  • Hungary
  • November 30 2017

The Hungarian Competition Authority (HCA) was recently given significant new investigative powers under the framework of its merger control duties. Should parties decide not to submit a voluntary filing when meeting the voluntary notification threshold, the HCA can initiate an investigation on its own accord and undertake a fully fledged merger control proceeding. The HCA recently announced that it has commenced its first such ex officio merger control investigation.

Legality of large retail chains' use of rebates remains dubious
  • Hungary
  • August 24 2017

Following a Hungarian Competition Authority (HCA) decision that its rebate system violated the Trade Act, retail chain Spar went all the way to the Supreme Court. All judicial forums upheld the HCA's decision and the illegality of such rebates seemed to be settled. However, the Budapest Metropolitan Court recently overturned another HCA decision, which was somewhat surprising considering that the Supreme Court had already upheld the HCA's decision in the relatively similar Spar.

HCA steps up against bid rigging in public procurement
  • Hungary
  • July 06 2017

Public procurements are often targets for bid rigging and the Hungarian authorities and legislature have made extra efforts to fight this kind of behaviour. While it is not the primary authority for monitoring public procurements, the Hungarian Competition Authority (HCA) is one authority fighting anti-competitive behaviour in public procurement. Besides investigating violations, the HCA is also taking steps towards prevention and raising awareness.

Implementation of EU Antitrust Damages Directive
  • Hungary
  • May 18 2017

An important part of the recent major amendment to the Competition Act was the timely implementation of the EU Antitrust Damages Directive into Hungarian law. While it was already possible to claim damages for a competition law infringement under Hungarian law, the directive's implementation introduced special rules for damages claims arising out of competition law infringement and the enforcement of such claims. It also introduced several solutions which are new to Hungarian law.

Effective ways to approach new merger control regime
  • Hungary
  • March 23 2017

Recent amendments to the Competition Act have significantly revised the merger control threshold system. The turnover thresholds for triggering a filing obligation have been increased. In addition, a voluntary threshold has been introduced, effectively transposing the voluntary notification system into Hungarian competition law for transactions where the mandatory thresholds are not met, but the parties have achieved a combined turnover in Hungary of more than Ft5 billion.

Employment & Benefits

Contributed by Schoenherr Attorneys at Law
Incapacity to work – what can employers do?
  • Hungary
  • November 22 2017

Employers are often frustrated by employees' incapacity to work for health reasons, but they must act with care when addressing such situations. In an attempt to protect employee interests, legal regulations provide certain restrictions on what employers can do if an employee is unable to work for health reasons. A recent Supreme Court decision has further clarified some of these restrictions.

Intragroup transfers of HR data
  • Hungary
  • September 20 2017

Organisations with legal entities and employees in several EU member states often try to centralise their human resources (HR) functions to some extent, which occasionally requires them to share employee and HR data within their group. Although existing Hungarian law provides a stable legal environment with clear rules for employers as data processors, there is a general feeling of uncertainty around this topic, which is partly due to the upcoming entry into force of the EU General Data Protection Regulation.

Conflicts of interest in employment relationships
  • Hungary
  • June 28 2017

Although the Labour Code fails to define a 'conflict of interest', its general principles prohibit employees from engaging in conduct which could jeopardise their employer's rightful economic interests. Depending on the circumstances, a conflict may constitute a severe violation of the employee's employment terms and can be punished appropriately. In other cases, a conflict may arise that is not the employee's fault, which can therefore be appropriately rectified without penalties.

Consultation duties in event of collective redundancy
  • Hungary
  • April 12 2017

The existing Labour Code amended employers' consultation duties in the event of a collective redundancy. When the code entered into force, this change seemed technical and went somewhat unnoticed among other more significant changes. However, the change is important, as it simplifies employers' consultation duties in the absence of employee representative bodies. Simultaneously, the new rule's compliance with EU law has raised questions around how employers should act.

Workforce reorganisation under anti-discrimination rules
  • Hungary
  • February 15 2017

In Hungary, employers have significant freedom to change their organisational structure and reorganise their workforce, which includes dismissing employees. However, there are some limitations – both generally and in the context of anti-discrimination rules. Even if the courts respect employers' freedom in organising their workforce, employers must be careful not to exceed the limits of this freedom in order to prevent disputes.

Energy & Natural Resources

New initiatives introduced to meet 2020 renewable energy targets
  • Hungary
  • October 03 2016

The government is supporting a range of projects to achieve its 2020 renewable energy targets, including Hungary's first small-scale geothermal power plant and an e-mobility action plan. Alongside these sector and project-specific incentives is the mandatory feed-in tariff system – an overall system of incentives for renewable energy intended to subsidise electricity that is produced from renewable, waste and co-generated energy.

FIT system: an overview
  • Hungary
  • September 19 2016

In 2003 the feed-in tariff (FIT) system was introduced to subsidise electricity production from renewable, waste and co-generated energy. In January 2008 MAVIR Zrt, which operates the FIT system, established the mandatory feed-in balance group. Electricity producers that are eligible to join the balance group are subject to certain requirements regarding annual production forecasts, payment obligations and takeover terms.

Intellectual Property

Contributed by Danubia Patent & Law Office LLC
When is a trademark application made in bad faith?
  • Hungary
  • January 08 2018

As it is usually difficult to prove the existence of bad faith in respect of trademarks, case law is often reluctant to apply this prohibition. This was the case with a recent Metropolitan Tribunal case. Fortunately, the Metropolitan Court of Appeal was more flexible in this respect and interpreted the facts concerning bad faith alongside another issue, thus leading to different interpretations of the concept of due cause by the tribunal and the court.

Globalisation and the use of geographical names in trademarks
  • Hungary
  • December 18 2017

The owner of the international trademark ELEVEN PARIS filed for an extension of protection in Hungary, which the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO) refused on the basis that the inclusion of the geographical name Paris could be misleading. The Metropolitan Tribunal annulled the HIPO's decision and ordered it to re-examine the application. The tribunal's obiter dicta on globalisation and its consequences for the use of geographical names in trademarks are notable.

Same facts, different outcome: HIPO and Metropolitan Tribunal disagree on likelihood of confusion
  • Hungary
  • December 04 2017

A recent Metropolitan Court of Appeal case demonstrates that the determination of likelihood of confusion is often a sensitive issue. This case is notable, as the Hungarian Intellectual Property (HIPO) and the Metropolitan Tribunal came to different conclusions after examining the same facts. Although the HIPO rejected the opposition – holding that the visual and phonetic similarities between the marks in question were weak – the tribunal (and subsequently the court) disagreed.

Upcoming amendments to Law on Utility Models
  • Hungary
  • November 06 2017

A number of amendments to the Law on Utility Models will take effect in January 2018. The most substantial amendments are the official confirmation of simultaneous patent and utility model protection and the introduction of an option to request an opinion from the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office on novelty and inventive step. These opinions can be used in infringement cases to prevent proceedings from being suspended when a utility model's novelty or inventive step has been called into question.

Likelihood of confusion or reputation?
  • Hungary
  • September 04 2017

In a recent case involving the EU mark THE BODYSHOP, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office considered all of the arguments for opposition – namely, the likelihood of confusion and the prior mark's reputation. However, on review, the Metropolitan Tribunal found this to be superfluous, explaining that if a likelihood of confusion exists, reference to reputation is unnecessary.