Latest updates

Institutional cooperation to address competition challenges of digital economy
SAI Law & Economics
  • Competition & Antitrust
  • Mexico
  • 12 December 2019

The Federal Telecommunications Institute (IFT) has exclusive jurisdiction over cases, procurement and advocacy in competition matters relating to the broadcasting and telecoms sectors, while the Federal Economic Competition Commission (COFECE) has jurisdiction in competition matters regarding all other sectors. While this allocation of jurisdiction between the IFT and the COFECE may appear straightforward, in reality, there is no clear-cut division of powers with regard to digital markets.

It's confirmed! CIPAA applies prospectively to construction contracts
Shearn Delamore & Co
  • Arbitration & ADR
  • Malaysia
  • 12 December 2019

After much anticipation, the Federal Court has finally confirmed that the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 applies only to construction contracts entered into after the act took effect on 15 April 2014. As such, any adjudication proceedings based on a claim arising from a construction contract which was entered into before that date, including adjudication decisions, are null and void.

Supreme Court confirms that inadequately justified arbitral award amounts to arbitrator misconduct
George Z Georgiou & Associates LLC
  • Arbitration & ADR
  • Cyprus
  • 12 December 2019

In a recent Supreme Court case, the appellant appealed against a first-instance judgment in which he had sought to annul an arbitral award. The dispute related to the non-payment of a loan granted by the respondent to the appellant and a subsequent challenge of the amount owed. Arbitration had taken place in which the arbitrator had issued his decision in favour of the respondent.

CAT upholds decision on outdoor media owners' discount rates
Gorrissen Federspiel
  • Competition & Antitrust
  • Denmark
  • 12 December 2019

The Competition Appeals Tribunal recently upheld a decision by the Competition Council which found that two outdoor advertising companies, Clear Channel Danmark A/S and AFA JCDecaux A/S, had coordinated discount rates through an agreement. The council found that this anti-competitive behaviour had continued as a concerted practice for several years after the agreement had expired.

Court exempts airline from Immigration Authority fine
Freidenberg Freidenberg & Lifsic
  • Aviation
  • Argentina
  • 11 December 2019

The Immigration Authority (DNM) repeatedly imposes substantial fines on carriers. Despite the fact that in many cases these fines have been wrongly imposed, airlines must pay any outstanding fines in order to file a judicial complaint against the DNM, so the fines are widely viewed as another cost of operating in Argentina. That said, a number of airlines have recently challenged the DNM's fines and the courts have given a clear sign that, even with the above difficulties, it is worth challenging this legal loophole.

Moral harassment in the workplace: what is Luxembourg's stance?
Castegnaro
  • Employment & Benefits
  • Luxembourg
  • 11 December 2019

The International Labour Conference recently adopted Convention 190 on Violence and Harassment at Work, which reminds member states of their responsibility to promote a general environment of zero tolerance. In its preamble, the convention states that violence and harassment in the world of work can be a violation of human rights and threaten equal opportunities and are incompatible with decent work. But what is the legal framework in Luxembourg?

Marketing authorisation holder lacks standing to challenge off-label prescription for unlicensed products
Westerberg & Partners Advokatbyrå Ab
  • Healthcare & Life Sciences
  • Sweden
  • 11 December 2019

The Swedish system for medicinal products is generally product based. Prescriptions as such are product based (ie, by brand name or generic product name) and the indication for which the product is intended cannot be filled in anywhere by the prescriber. Off-label prescriptions are therefore not generally possible in the 'official' prescription system. However, when it comes to accessing unlicensed medicinal products, the system for licences on a named-patient basis works differently.

Recent case law on compulsory licences and use-up periods
Simmons & Simmons LLP
  • Healthcare & Life Sciences
  • Germany
  • 11 December 2019

According to Section 24(1) of the German Patent Act, a compulsory licence can be granted to a patent infringer. Recent case law suggests that this possibility is becoming increasingly relevant. Further, in a recent originator-originator pharma case, the enforcement of a recall obligation was for the first time suspended for a certain period for public health reasons.

Superior Labour Court rules out simultaneous use of hazard allowance and risk premium
CGM Advogados
  • Employment & Benefits
  • Brazil
  • 11 December 2019

The Labour Code provides for two payments which eligible employees can receive in addition to their base salary: the hazard allowance and the risk premium. Since 2015, the Superior Labour Court panels have issued conflicting decisions on whether employees can receive the hazard allowance and the risk premium simultaneously. Now, the Superior Labour Court has determined that the additional payments cannot be received simultaneously, even if employees are exposed to different adverse conditions.

PMPRB releases draft guidelines operationalising amended Patented Medicines Regulations
Smart & Biggar
  • Healthcare & Life Sciences
  • Canada
  • 11 December 2019

The Patented Medicines Prices Review Board recently released new draft guidelines for consultation and a backgrounder. The new guidelines aim to operationalise the amended Patented Medicines Regulations, which come into force on 1 July 2020, and provide a number of circumstances in which categories or price ceilings may be reassessed.

Salary insurance for employee illness
Rihm Rechtsanwälte
  • Employment & Benefits
  • Switzerland
  • 11 December 2019

If employees become ill through no fault of their own and are therefore unable to work, they are still entitled to a wage. Employers' obligation to continue to pay wages is governed by Article 324a of the Code of Obligations. Employers may release themselves from this obligation if they offer employees health insurance for a daily allowance. The Federal Supreme Court has formulated the requirements for employee health insurance.

Constitutionality of 5% interest rate payment rule under Press Labour Law
Gün + Partners
  • Employment & Benefits
  • Turkey
  • 11 December 2019

The Constitutional Court recently found that the requirement for employers to pay interest at a rate of 5% for each day that a journalist's overtime payments remain outstanding conflicts with the Constitution. The court ruled that this requirement places an excessive burden on employers and may result in journalists' unjustified enrichment. Therefore, the court repealed the provision on the grounds that it breached the principles of proportionality and equality.

Election manifestos – what are the main parties pledging on employment issues?
Lewis Silkin
  • Employment & Benefits
  • United Kingdom
  • 11 December 2019

Despite the dominance of Brexit, employment issues are one of the main election battlegrounds for all of the major political parties. There is a particular focus on current hot topics, including insecure work and the gig economy, the gender (and other) pay gaps and new mechanisms for enforcing employment rights. This article covers the key employment measures that have been proposed by the Conservatives, Labour, the Liberal Democrats, the Green Party and the Scottish National Party.

Delivery damaged – only damaged pallets and packaging are liable for reimbursement
Arnecke Sibeth Dabelstein
  • Shipping & Transport
  • Germany
  • 11 December 2019

No matter how well goods are packaged and how great the effort of a carrier to consign a delivery in perfect condition to the customer, damage to goods, pallets and packaging cannot always be avoided. If damage occurs, the carrier will quickly be faced with a claim for damages, either from the shipper, the recipient or their insurer. The Federal Court of Justice redefined the calculation of damages in a ruling at the end of 2018.

Assessment of costs in District Court out of date
RPC
  • Litigation
  • Hong Kong
  • 10 December 2019

The monetary jurisdiction for civil cases heard by Hong Kong's busy District Court was significantly increased in December 2018. In light of this, the District Court now determines more complex and important civil cases. Therefore, a good case can be made for the abolition of the so-called 'Two-Thirds Rule'. If this is a step too far, a legislative provision should be implemented that provides judges with a wide and flexible discretion to depart from the rule where appropriate in all the circumstances.

Does Interest Rate Restriction Act apply to corporate bonds?
Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu
  • Capital Markets
  • Japan
  • 10 December 2019

Interest rates applicable to loans made in Japan are subject to the Interest Rate Restriction Act, which is Japan's usury law. For decades, legal experts and others questioned whether this regulation also applied to corporate bonds, thereby affording bond issuers the same protections against high interest rates as those enjoyed by borrowers. This longstanding question appears to have been resolved by a recent Tokyo District Court judgment.

Enforcement of foreign rulings against Supreme Court state ruling
Pérez-Llorca
  • Litigation
  • Spain
  • 10 December 2019

The Supreme Court recently ruled in a case concerning two elements of international law: state immunity from enforcement and declarations of enforceability. This ruling is significant because it states that the only precedent on the topic of enforcement immunity is a 2005 decision and because it applies the United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property, which is not yet in force. The ruling is also significant with regard to its interpretation of an 'enforceability declaration'.

Oral contract does not prevent agent from being paid in circumstances not catered for in contract
RPC
  • Litigation
  • United Kingdom
  • 10 December 2019

​In a recent case, the Court of Appeal held that an oral contract for a specified introduction fee payable to an agent if a property sold at a particular price did not prevent the agent from being remunerated when that property was sold for a lesser sum (despite the contract being silent on the matter). However, the sum awarded by the court was significantly lower than the introduction fee specified in the contract.

FDI in insurance intermediaries – an update
Tuli & Co
  • Insurance
  • India
  • 10 December 2019

The Insurance Regulatory Development Authority of India (IRDAI) recently notified the Indian Insurance Companies (Foreign Investment) Amendment Rules 2019 and the IRDAI (Insurance Intermediaries) (Amendment) Regulations 2019, which have introduced additional conditions with which insurance intermediaries that have a majority shareholding of foreign investors must comply. The regulations have brought much-needed clarity, but the insurance industry's reaction remains to be seen.

New relationship between collective, certification and individual multi-use marks
IP Law Galli
  • Intellectual Property
  • Italy
  • 09 December 2019

Following the implementation of the EU Trademark Directive in February 2019, there has been much debate in Italy over how to manage and choose between collective marks, individual multi-use marks and certification marks. While the new IP regime offers new opportunities, it also requires a careful review of existing regulations and a case-by-case verification of whether a collective mark can be maintained or whether it must be transformed into a certification mark.

Current search

Refine search

Work area

Jurisdiction

Firm