Latest updates

Dishonesty is a serious allegation and must not be pleaded lightly: rolled-up plea is insufficient
  • Litigation
  • Cayman Islands
  • August 21 2018

The Grand Court has set out the requirements for pleading a cause of action of dishonest assistance and reaffirmed the established principles of the defence of estoppel. The decision provides welcome comfort to corporate entities with robust and thorough systems for detecting fraud.

Singapore and BVI courts cooperate against cross-border fraud
Harney Westwood & Riegels
  • Private Client & Offshore Services
  • British Virgin Islands
  • August 16 2018

The Singapore Court of Appeal recently ruled to reinstate and expand a Mareva injunction against fraudster defendants in a conspiracy claim, providing strong support for an earlier decision of the BVI Commercial Court in related proceedings. The decision demonstrates the importance of consistency between courts in multiple jurisdictions in complex cross-border cases.

Singapore and BVI courts cooperate against cross-border fraud
  • Litigation
  • British Virgin Islands
  • August 14 2018

The Singapore Court of Appeal recently ruled to reinstate and expand a Mareva injunction against fraudster defendants in a conspiracy claim, providing strong support for an earlier decision of the BVI Commercial Court in related proceedings. The decision demonstrates the importance of consistency between courts in multiple jurisdictions in complex cross-border cases.

Court of Appeal reaffirms that it will rarely reverse findings of fact
Harney Westwood & Riegels
  • Private Client & Offshore Services
  • British Virgin Islands
  • August 09 2018

The BVI Court of Appeal recently dismissed an appeal against the liquidators of BVI company Pioneer Freight Futures Company Limited and reaffirmed the established law regarding reversing findings of fact. The court held that it will intervene only in rare cases, such as when there is no evidence to support the conclusion, the conclusion was based on a misunderstanding of the evidence or the conclusion was one that no reasonable judge could have reached.

Court of Appeal reaffirms that it will rarely reverse findings of fact
  • Litigation
  • British Virgin Islands
  • August 07 2018

The BVI Court of Appeal recently dismissed an appeal against the liquidators of BVI company Pioneer Freight Futures Company Limited and reaffirmed the established law regarding reversing findings of fact. The court held that it will intervene only in rare cases, such as when there is no evidence to support the conclusion, the conclusion was based on a misunderstanding of the evidence or the conclusion was one that no reasonable judge could have reached.

Trusts and disclosure: a recent lesson
Harney Westwood & Riegels
  • Private Client & Offshore Services
  • British Virgin Islands
  • August 02 2018

A recent BVI decision highlights the need for trustees to think carefully and, if in doubt, take advice before refusing an information request from a beneficiary. The consequences of getting this wrong (not least in potential personal cost exposure for the trustee) can be severe.

Trusts and disclosure: a recent lesson
  • Litigation
  • British Virgin Islands
  • July 31 2018

A recent BVI decision highlights the need for trustees to think carefully and, if in doubt, take advice before refusing an information request from a beneficiary. The consequences of getting this wrong (not least in potential personal cost exposure for the trustee) can be severe.

AHAB v Saad – importance of a particularised and principled tracing claim
Harney Westwood & Riegels LLP
  • Private Client & Offshore Services
  • Cayman Islands
  • July 26 2018

In Ahmad Hamad Algosaibi & Brothers Company (AHAB) v Saad, the Grand Court found that AHAB's claims, which attempted to trace its funds into the hands of defendant SIFCO5, were "unparticularised and unprincipled". Further, AHAB was unsuccessful in establishing that funds representing traceable proceeds from the Money Exchange reached SIFCO5 or in articulating any discernible cause of action against SIFCO5 in respect of such funds.

AHAB v Saad – importance of a particularised and principled tracing claim
  • White Collar Crime
  • Cayman Islands
  • July 23 2018

In Ahmad Hamad Algosaibi & Brothers Company (AHAB) v Saad, the Grand Court found that AHAB's claims, which attempted to trace its funds into the hands of defendant SIFCO5, were "unparticularised and unprincipled". Further, AHAB was unsuccessful in establishing that funds representing traceable proceeds from the Money Exchange reached SIFCO5 or in articulating any discernible cause of action against SIFCO5 in respect of such funds.

Security for costs – a foreign affair
Harney Westwood & Riegels
  • Private Client & Offshore Services
  • Cayman Islands
  • July 19 2018

During the early stages of litigation, a well-advised defendant will consider how to enforce a Cayman Islands court costs order in the foreign jurisdiction where the claimant's assets are located, and whether it should seek security from the claimant for the costs of doing so. The Court of Appeal has recently considered whether a foreign claimant should give security limited to the costs of enforcing an order in the foreign jurisdiction only or for the (much greater) amount of defending the appeal.

Security for costs – a foreign affair
  • Litigation
  • Cayman Islands
  • July 17 2018

During the early stages of litigation, a well-advised defendant will consider how to enforce a Cayman Islands court costs order in the foreign jurisdiction where the claimant's assets are located, and whether it should seek security from the claimant for the costs of doing so. The Court of Appeal has recently considered whether a foreign claimant should give security limited to the costs of enforcing an order in the foreign jurisdiction only or for the (much greater) amount of defending the appeal.

Grand Court dismisses multibillion-dollar fraud claims in one of largest Ponzi schemes in history
Harney Westwood & Riegels LLP
  • Private Client & Offshore Services
  • Cayman Islands
  • July 12 2018

In a landmark ruling, the Grand Court emphatically dismissed a multibillion-dollar claim in a case involving allegations of fraud arising from one of the largest corporate collapses of the financial crisis. The case has showcased the court's ability to manage high-profile large-scale litigation, demonstrating especially the quality of the Cayman Islands judiciary and the court's ability to use cutting-edge technology, as well as the resources and flexibility to manage a year-long, multi-jurisdictional trial.

Grand Court dismisses multibillion-dollar fraud claims in one of largest Ponzi schemes in history
  • White Collar Crime
  • Cayman Islands
  • July 09 2018

In a landmark ruling, the Grand Court emphatically dismissed a multibillion-dollar claim in a case involving allegations of fraud arising from one of the largest corporate collapses of the financial crisis. The case has showcased the court's ability to manage high-profile large-scale litigation, demonstrating especially the quality of the Cayman Islands judiciary and the court's ability to use cutting-edge technology, as well as the resources and flexibility to manage a year-long, multi-jurisdictional trial.

Sixtieth anniversary of New York Convention – time to choose BVI arbitration and enforcement
  • Arbitration & ADR
  • British Virgin Islands
  • July 05 2018

The British Virgin Islands is a pro-arbitration jurisdiction. Under the Arbitration Act, with regard to both New York Convention awards and non-New York Convention awards, the party against which the award has been made can make representation to the court regarding a refusal to enforce. An example of the British Virgin Islands' pro-enforcement approach can be seen in Belport Development Limited v Chimichanga Corporation.

Sixtieth anniversary of New York Convention – time to choose BVI arbitration and enforcement
Harney Westwood & Riegels
  • Private Client & Offshore Services
  • British Virgin Islands
  • July 05 2018

The British Virgin Islands is a pro-arbitration jurisdiction. Under the Arbitration Act, with regard to both New York Convention awards and non-New York Convention awards, the party against which the award has been made can make representation to the court regarding a refusal to enforce. An example of the British Virgin Islands' pro-enforcement approach can be seen in Belport Development Limited v Chimichanga Corporation.

Court declines to restrain foreign trust proceedings
  • Litigation
  • Cayman Islands
  • July 03 2018

The recent Grand Court decision in T Co v AA, BB, CC, DD, EE (a minor) is a good reminder of the court's approach to service out of the jurisdiction and provides insight on the scope of jurisdiction clauses contained in trust instruments.

Court declines to restrain foreign trust proceedings
Harney Westwood & Riegels
  • Private Client & Offshore Services
  • Cayman Islands
  • June 28 2018

The recent Grand Court decision in T Co v AA, BB, CC, DD, EE (a minor) is a good reminder of the court's approach to service out of the jurisdiction and provides insight on the scope of jurisdiction clauses contained in trust instruments.

Freezing injunction: what is a good arguable case?
  • Litigation
  • British Virgin Islands
  • June 26 2018

The BVI Commercial Court has provided helpful guidance as to the threshold for a good arguable case, dismissing an application to discharge a worldwide freezing injunction obtained by a claimant. The court held that where there is a good arguable case that a defendant has acted fraudulently or dishonestly, or with "unacceptable low standards of morality giving rise to a feeling of uneasiness about the defendant", further evidence is often unnecessary to justify a freezing injunction.

Freezing injunction: what is a good arguable case?
Harney Westwood & Riegels
  • Private Client & Offshore Services
  • British Virgin Islands
  • June 21 2018

The BVI Commercial Court has provided helpful guidance as to the threshold for a good arguable case, dismissing an application to discharge a worldwide freezing injunction obtained by a claimant. The court held that where there is a good arguable case that a defendant has acted fraudulently or dishonestly, or with "unacceptable low standards of morality giving rise to a feeling of uneasiness about the defendant", further evidence is often unnecessary to justify a freezing injunction.

Avoiding evasion: court takes pragmatic approach to serving uncooperative defendants abroad
  • Litigation
  • British Virgin Islands
  • June 19 2018

International litigation and asset recovery require the pursuit of defendants and their assets across borders; therefore, it is a routine aspect of BVI litigation for claimants to serve legal documents abroad. Two recent decisions should significantly decrease the delay in effecting service abroad and pave the way for a more efficient approach to service out in the future.