In early 2018 the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Eli Lilly Canada's appeal of a trial decision awarding more than $70 million to Teva Canada under Section 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations. The Federal Court of Appeal recently granted Teva's cross-appeal seeking to add to its recovery lost pipe fill sales and an adjustment to account for underreporting of sales in the data relied on by both parties' experts. Eli Lilly has since applied to the Supreme Court for leave to appeal.
The Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) recently announced that the next step in its guideline reform will be the inception of a multi-stakeholder working group intended to gather stakeholder input on key technical aspects of the new regime. The PMPRB anticipates concurrently releasing more specific guidance on how it foresees putting the anticipated regulatory changes into operation.
The Supreme Court recently dismissed Idenix's application for leave to appeal the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal affirming the trial decision relating to two competing patents over Gilead's SOVALDI (sofosbuvir). The Federal Court of Appeal upheld the validity of Gilead's patent and declared Idenix's patent invalid on the basis of insufficiency of disclosure and inutility.
The Ontario Court of Appeal recently dismissed Abbott and Takeda's appeal of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice's decision to dismiss their motion for summary judgment in an action brought by Apotex under Section 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations. The action concerned lansoprazole, the active ingredient in Apo-Lansoprazole. The Ontario Court of Appeal concluded that the motions judge had not erred in finding that Apo-Lansoprazole would have received approval in 2007.
Canada has historically been a much less active jurisdiction for patent litigation compared to the United States, which can be explained in part by the simple fact that the US market is almost 10 times the size of the Canadian market. However, there are a few notable differences in the procedure and substantive law applied in both jurisdictions that have resulted in Canada becoming an increasingly attractive option for high-stakes patent litigation in recent years.