We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
10 January 2019
'Capital call' facilities (also known as subscription line facilities) are facilities made available to funds (often on a revolving credit basis and for general working capital purposes) which are secured against the uncalled capital commitments of the investors in the fund including:
It will generally also include security over the bank account into which investors are required to deposit their capital contributions. The Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership (ELP) is a common vehicle used for structuring private equity funds and, where so structured, the security over the right to make capital calls and the right to receive proceeds of capital contributions will be granted by way of an assignment by the fund (acting through its general partner) of those rights as they arise under the fund's Cayman Islands law governed limited partnership agreement (LPA) and any applicable investor subscription documents. Here, a 'fund' is a reference to an investment fund established as an ELP and a 'limited partner' or an 'investor' is a reference to a limited partner in such a fund.
In addition to the security package outlined above, another key feature of capital call facilities is the 'borrowing base'. Broadly, this caps the amount that may be outstanding under the facility at any time (together with hedging exposure and non-cash backed letters of credit) to the lesser of:
Only eligible investors to which the lender attributes a certain credit score will be included in the borrowing base calculations, with other investors in the fund being excluded investors whose capital commitments do not form part of the borrowing base or only being included (and then at a lower advance rate) if they meet certain additional information and due diligence requirements.
Therefore, prior to entering into a capital call facility, a lender should focus its due diligence on two main elements. The first is an assessment of the identity and credit quality of each investor in the fund, to establish which investors will be included in the borrowing base calculation and then set the borrowing base at the appropriate level. The second is a documentary review of the fund's and its general partner's main constitutional and corporate documents, most notably the LPA, investor subscription documents and any side letters entered into between the fund and an investor in relation to the terms of the LPA. This article examines some of the key documentary due diligence points a lender and its counsel should consider when reviewing the LPA, investor subscription documents and related side letters.
At the outset, the fund structure should also be reviewed to establish whether there are any feeder fund or alternative investment fund entities or any intermediate general partners. If so, they will need to be considered in the context of the financing structure. If there is any investment adviser or investment manager, the advisory or management agreement will need to be checked to ensure the general partner has not delegated its power to call capital to the adviser or manager.
Is borrowing or indebtedness permitted?
The LPA should specifically permit the fund to incur indebtedness (be that borrowing or guaranteeing obligations of an affiliate fund or portfolio company, should the financing structure require) and any limitations on the amount or term of such indebtedness should be noted.
What are the mechanics for capital call notices?
The provisions setting out how capital can be called (including the notice provisions and timeframe for payment by limited partners) and also the purpose for which the general partner (on behalf of the fund) is permitted to issue capital call notices to the limited partners need to be understood. Specifically, whether the LPA permits capital call notices to be issued in order to repay principal debt, interest accrued thereon and costs related thereto is a relevant consideration, as is whether the LPA makes it clear how the total amount specified in a capital call notice issued in order to fund the repayment of indebtedness would be allocated among the investors.
Is the fund permitted to grant security over the limited partners' uncalled capital commitments, the right to make capital calls and its assets generally?
Section 16(1) of the Cayman Islands Exempted Limited Partnership Law 2014 (ELP law) makes it clear that any right to make capital calls and receive the proceeds thereof is an asset of the fund. It should be checked that under the LPA, the fund is permitted to grant security over these assets. If the LPA (or any side letter (see below)) designates any investor as a confidential investor, whose identity cannot be disclosed or in relation to whom capital call rights cannot be assigned, these investors will likely be excluded from the borrowing base.
The LPA should also be checked to establish whether the LPA permits (or at least does not prohibit and permits by way of the general powers) the limited partners paying capital contributions into a specific bank account over which the lender under the credit agreement takes a security interest.
What is the term of the fund?
This should be considered in light of the proposed maturity date of the capital call facility.
In what circumstances may the fund be terminated and dissolved prior to the end of the term?
Pursuant to Section 36(2) of the ELP law, the fund will be dissolved upon the filing of a notice of dissolution with the Cayman Islands registrar of ELPs. Section 36(1) of the ELP law states that, unless otherwise specified in the LPA, the fund will be wound up upon the passing of a resolution of all the general partners and a two-thirds majority of the limited partners. The LPA may modify this position and will usually also set out other early termination events. The LPA will typically provide a contractual waterfall for distribution of the fund's assets upon its liquidation and it should be established whether creditors of the fund are at the top of this waterfall.
What is the investment/commitment period and in what circumstances may it be suspended or terminated?
The right of the general partner to call capital from investors will likely be restricted upon expiry or suspension of the investment or commitment period. Examples of potential termination or suspension events are:
It should be established whether, notwithstanding such restrictions, capital may still be called from limited partners after termination or suspension of the investment period or commitment period in order to fund repayment of the principal outstanding under the capital call facility and related accrued interest and costs.
Are there overcall provisions in the LPA for any defaulting limited partner or excused limited partner?
These are provisions that mean if a limited partner has defaulted or is excused from making a capital contribution to fund certain investments, the fund is permitted to call capital from the non-defaulting or non-excused limited partners up to the amount of such non-defaulting or non-excused limited partners' unfunded capital commitments. Often the overcall obligations of other limited partners are capped under the LPA. For example, they may be limited to the lesser of the relevant limited partner's unfunded capital commitments and a certain percentage of its total capital contribution. Any such limitation should be noted. It is usual for any defaulting limited partners to be excluded from the borrowing base.
The excuse provisions in the LPA should be checked to understand whether the capital commitment of a limited partner that is excused or opts out from making a capital contribution to fund a certain investment would remain unaffected (and so available) for the purposes of repayment of the principal outstanding under the capital call facility and related accrued interest and costs.
It should be ascertained whether, under the LPA, the general partner has the ability to recall distributions that have been made to limited partners and, if it does, what the limitations and terms of the recall are. The relevant considerations for lenders are likely to be whether these distributed and recallable amounts increase the amount of the unused capital commitment of the relevant limited partner and whether these distributed and recallable amounts will be available for recall to allow the fund to repay principal, accrued interest and other costs in respect of the capital call facility (including where the investment or commitment period has been suspended or terminated). If such distributed and recallable amounts are not so available, lenders may consider excluding these amounts from the borrowing base.
Transfer provisions – limited partners and general partners
The transfer provisions in the LPA should be reviewed to understand in what circumstances a limited partner may transfer its interest in the fund, grant security over its interest in the fund or withdraw as a limited partner in the fund and, for example, whether prior consent of the general partner is required. As noted above, the identity of the investors in the fund will be an important consideration for lenders in their credit evaluation and in setting the borrowing base level.
The circumstances in which a general partner may transfer its general partner interest in the fund (and whether this needs a certain percentage of limited partners to give prior consent) or in which the general partner may be removed or replaced (with or without cause) should also be checked. The identity of the general partner will also likely be important to the lenders and any change is likely to trigger a repayment event under the capital call facility.
Where these events will cause the investment or commitment period to be suspended or terminated, as mentioned above, it should be established whether capital calls may still be made to repay principal, accrued interest and costs of the capital call facility during such suspension or after such termination (as the case may be).
Are there any key person events under the LPA?
The LPA may name certain key persons who must dedicate a certain amount of their time to the fund during the investment period and/or term of the fund. If any such specified key persons fail to do so, this may be a key person event under the LPA. The occurrence of a key person event may cause the investment or commitment period to be suspended or terminated. If this is the case, it should be checked whether capital calls may still be made to repay principal, accrued interest and costs of the capital call facility during such suspension or after such termination (as the case may be).
Side letters are letters entered into between the fund and a limited partner which supplement the terms of the LPA as they apply to that limited partner. The terms of any side letters should be reviewed to confirm the absence of provisions that adversely affect any of the findings arising from the LPA due diligence review or factors that otherwise adversely affect or may potentially prejudice the security created or the lenders' right to repayment of the facility. There have been examples where side letters have expressly prohibited the fund from granting a security interest over a particular investor's uncalled capital commitment.
Some points to be considered when reviewing side letters are:
Along with the growth and maturity of the fund finance market, funds and their counsel have become increasingly familiar with lenders' LPA requirements. Therefore, newer LPAs often include the provisions lenders would require in order to provide financing under a capital call facility. However, the above is not an exhaustive list of all points to be considered or all the issues that could arise on review of an LPA. There are also exceptions, especially where funds continue to use an older form of LPA, where the relevant provisions are not found in the LPA or where issues of interpretation arise. Lenders and funds should seek the advice of their legal counsel on the relevant fund documentation on a deal-by-deal basis to ensure the relevant issues are sufficiently addressed in the fund documents at the outset of any proposed transaction.
For further information on this topic please contact David Nelson or James Heinicke at Ogier by telephone (+852 3656 6000) or email (firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com). The Ogier website can be accessed at www.ogier.com.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.