Your Subscription

We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.





Login
Twitter LinkedIn




Login
  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
Forward Share Print
Lennox Paton

Supreme Court clarifies International Business Companies Act

Newsletters

19 April 2012

Private Client & Offshore Services Bahamas

Business Companies Act amendments
Comment


In its decision in In the Matter of the International Business Companies Act 2000 and Benton Management Ltd v the Registrar General (1) the Supreme Court clarified amendments made by the International Business Companies (Amendment) Act 2010.

The court held that there is no statutory bar preventing the applicant applying for the restoration of an international business company, even if the company was struck off before the commencement of the International Business Companies Act of 2000.

Business Companies Act amendments

Amendments made to the Business Companies Act in 2010 stipulate that notwithstanding that an international business company has been struck off the Companies Register for non-payment of fees for a period exceeding five years, an application can be made to the court for the company to be restored. Upon restoration, the name of the company shall be deemed never to have been struck off.

In Tenesheles Trust v BDO Mann Judd (2) the court held that under the 2000 act, if an international business company had been struck off the Companies Register for non-payment of fees, the registrar of companies had no power to restore it. Following Tenesheles, the 2010 act amended Sections 165, 169 and 176 of the 2000 act, and repealed and replaced its Section 166.

As a result of those amendments, the power to restore an international business company is retroactive and has the effect of saving all international business companies struck off the register from 2000 until the commencement of the 2010 act.

Furthermore, with respect to companies struck off before the commencement of the 2000 act, an entitlement to be restored under the 1989 act does not expire, despite the commencement of the 2000 act which repealed and replaced its predecessor. This is because the transitional provision in Section 196(2) of the 2000 act provides that "all benefits accruing to any International Business Company registered in The Bahamas prior to the commencement of this Act shall not be affected by the coming into force of this Act".

Comment

Section 166 of the 2010 act is retroactive and is deemed to have come into force at the time of the commencement of the 2000 act. Thus, international business companies struck off under the 1989 act may also apply to be restored to the Companies Register, so long as the 2000 act commenced less than three years from the date on which the company was struck off under the 1989 act. (3)

For further information on this topic please contact Metta MacMillan-Hughes or Sophia Rolle at Lennox Paton by telephone (+1 242 502 5000), fax (+1 242 328 0566) or email (mmacmillan-hughes@lennoxpaton.com or srolle@lennoxpaton.com).

Endnotes

(1) [2012] 1 BHS J, No 2.

(2) [2009] 2 BHS J, No 17.

(3) See In the Matter of the International Business Companies Act 2000 v the Registrar General (supra).

The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.

ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.

Forward Share Print

Authors

Metta MacMillan-Hughes

Metta MacMillan-Hughes

Sophia Rolle-Kapousouzoglou

Sophia Rolle-Kapousouzoglou

Register now for your free newsletter

View recent newsletter

More from this firm

  • CESRA: economic substance reporting deadline extension
  • New legislation aims to promote proper use of environment
  • COVID-19: force majeure and contract frustration
  • Guide to purchasing property in The Bahamas
  • Tax consequences of transferring Bahamian real property held by a company for estate planning purposes

More articles

  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • My account
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Compliance
  • Terms
  • Cookie policy
Online Media Partners
Inter-Pacific Bar Association (IPBA) International Bar Association (IBA) European Company Lawyers Association (ECLA) Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) American Bar Association Section of International Law (ABA)

© 1997-2021 Law Business Research

You need to be logged in to make a comment. Log in here.
Many thanks. Your comment has been sent.

Your details



Your comment or question *