Your Subscription

We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.





Login
Twitter LinkedIn




Login
  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
Forward Share Print
Harneys

Taking charge: Commercial Court delivers judgment on its jurisdiction to grant charging orders

Newsletters

11 June 2019

Litigation British Virgin Islands


The Commercial Court's important decision in Commercial Bank of Dubai v Abdalla Juma Majid Al-Sari has confirmed that the BVI courts have jurisdiction to grant charging orders.

Justice Adderley has now handed down his full judgment in Commercial Bank of Dubai.

Adderley largely agreed with and followed submissions on the bank's behalf in finding that there had been a statutory basis for the granting of charging orders in England before 1940, which meant that such jurisdiction vested in the BVI courts by virtue of Section 7 of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court Act 1969.

The judgment reaffirms that Adderley's decision in Stichting Nems v Gitlin was made per incuriam insofar as he concluded in that case that the BVI courts had no jurisdiction to grant charging orders. Adderley also helpfully restated the principles that guide the court in exercising its discretion as to whether a provisional charging order should be made final.

Charging orders are a critically important tool, particularly when enforcing foreign judgments, as they allow creditors to take a proprietary interest over assets owned by a debtor and can ultimately facilitate the sale of such assets in order to allow the creditor to realise their debt. Therefore, Commercial Bank of Dubai should be welcomed, as it avoids the need for the legislature to step in and fill what would otherwise have been a significant lacuna in BVI law.

For further information on this topic please contact Christopher Pease or Andrew Thorp at Harneys' Tortola office by telephone (+1 284 494 2233) or email (christopher.pease@harneys.com or andrew.thorp@harneys.com). Alternatively, contact Phillip Kite at Harneys' London office (+44 20 7842 6080) or email (phillip.kite@harneys.com). The Harneys website can be accessed at www.harneys.com.

The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.

ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.

Forward Share Print

Authors

Christopher Pease

Christopher Pease

Andrew Thorp

Andrew Thorp

Phillip Kite

Phillip Kite

Register now for your free newsletter

View recent newsletter

More from this firm

  • Scope of disclosure orders and contempt of court

More articles

  • Home
  • About
  • Updates
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • My account
  • Directory
  • OnDemand
  • Partners
  • Testimonials
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Compliance
  • Terms
  • Cookie policy
Online Media Partners
Inter-Pacific Bar Association (IPBA) International Bar Association (IBA) European Company Lawyers Association (ECLA) Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) American Bar Association Section of International Law (ABA)

© 1997-2021 Law Business Research

You need to be logged in to make a comment. Log in here.
Many thanks. Your comment has been sent.

Your details



Your comment or question *