We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
11 June 2018
On 13 April 2018 the Barcelona Court of Appeal issued two decisions confirming the Barcelona Commercial Court Numbers 1 and 4 rulings revoking the preliminary injunctions that they had granted ex parte at Mundipharma's request against the first generics in Spain of its oxycodone/naloxone medicinal product for the treatment of pain (Targin) (for further details please see "Barcelona courts lift preliminary injunctions previously granted ex parte in oxycodone/naloxone case").
Mundipharma is the holder of European Patent 2425825 (EP'825), entitled 'Pharmaceutical preparation containing oxycodone and naloxone'. Claim 1 of the patent relates to an oral sustained release pharmaceutical formulation comprising one to 150 mg of oxycodone hydrochloride and one to 50 mg of naloxone hydrochloride in a weight ratio of 2:1.
At first instance, the commercial courts revoked and lifted the preliminary injunctions that they had initially granted ex parte, as they concluded the prima facie invalidity of EP'825 due to added subject matter, as argued by the defendants. Thus, in their decisions, dated 18 and 19 July 2017 respectively, the judges considered that the original application of EP'825 comprised no pointer to the combination of features ultimately claimed in the patent. Hence, multiple selections would need to be made to reach such a combination of features.
The main grounds of Mundipharma's subsequent appeals were as follows:
The defendants opposed Mundipharma's appeals, reaffirming the invalidity of the patent due not only to added subject matter, but also to insufficiency of disclosure, lack of novelty and lack of inventive step, as they had argued in the first instance.
The Barcelona Court of Appeal dismissed Mundipharma's appeals and confirmed the revocation of the preliminary injunctions. In its decisions, the Barcelona Court of Appeal concluded that EP'825 was prima facie invalid due to added subject matter, as argued by the defendants.
The Barcelona Court of Appeal considered that the claims of EP'825 amounted to an inadmissible generalisation with respect to the original patent application. This was because the claims of EP'825, as granted, omitted essential elements of the invention as disclosed in the filed application, which at all times required that the formulation provide not only a sustained release, but also an invariable and independent release. However, the claims of the patent, as granted, did not require such invariable and independent release.
Having reached this conclusion, the Barcelona Court of Appeal found it unnecessary to further consider:
The Barcelona Court of Appeal's decisions are final, as Mundipharma cannot file any further appeal. Main proceedings on the merits are pending before the Barcelona Commercial Court Number 4. Opposition proceedings are also pending before the European Patent Office.
For further information on this topic please contact Núria Ribera at Grau & Angulo by telephone (+34 93 202 34 56) or email (email@example.com). The Grau & Angulo website can be accessed at www.ga-ip.com.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.