We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
28 June 2016
The focus on corporate governance has increased significantly since Satyam Computer Services Limited's corporate fraud and internal governance failure came to light. Post Satyam, the legislature has taken steps to incorporate certain basic principles of corporate governance in the revamped Companies Act 2013. These steps include provisions relating to:
For listed companies, corporate governance norms are even more stringent due to the need to protect the interests of multiple minority investors.
These general corporate governance norms apply in addition to the specific norms and regulations which may apply to an entity by virtue of the sector in which it operates. In this regard, it is important to consider that the Indian insurance sector is highly regulated in terms of the nature of business undertaken by insurance entities and the duty owned by these entities to their policyholders. In light of this, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) first introduced corporate governance guidelines for all Indian insurers on August 5 2009 (the 2009 guidelines).
The IRDAI recently replaced the 2009 guidelines with the Guidelines for Corporate Governance for Insurers in India of May 18 2016. The 2016 guidelines seek to incorporate relevant changes introduced by the Companies Act and consider other relevant changes in the insurance sector since 2009 in order to provide an appropriate corporate governance regime for Indian insurers. The 2016 guidelines also supersede the Guidelines on Reporting of Key Persons of October 9 2013 and stipulations regarding the appointment of statutory auditors issued through circulars of July 25 2005 and April 22 2009.
The 2016 guidelines specify the system of controls which Indian insurers must put in place and, among other things, set out norms for:
They also provide for disclosure requirements and whistleblowing provisions. The key features of the 2016 guidelines are summarised below.
Provisions in consonance with Companies Act
Under the 2016 guidelines, the boards of Indian insurers must appoint independent directors and at least one female director, in compliance with Section 149 of the Companies Act. The independent directors must meet and evaluate the performance of the insurer's board in accordance with the Companies Act.
Further, the 2016 guidelines provide norms for preventing conflicts of interest and mandate that insurers comply with the provisions regarding related-party transactions under Section 188 of the Companies Act.
Disclosures with respect to related-party transactions and remuneration paid to key managerial personnel must now be made in the annual accounts in compliance with the Companies Act. In addition, disclosures with respect to the persistency ratio must be made by insurers transacting life insurance business.
Finally, as per the Companies Act, insurers must maintain corporate social responsibility in order to perform their prescribed functions.
Constitution of board committees
The 2016 guidelines have extensively revamped the norms with respect to the constitution of board committees and their responsibilities with regard to managing insurers. The key changes are as follows:
All outsourcing arrangements must be approved by the committee of key management persons and should comply with the insurer's board-approved outsourcing policy. Further, the insurer's management must monitor and review the performance of agencies to which operations have been outsourced annually. Finally, the provision stipulating that outsourcing arrangements should be for a fixed three-year period has been deleted. The 2016 guidelines also reiterate that insurers are prohibited from outsourcing their core functions.
Insurers must file a certificate of compliance signed by the compliance officer. In addition, insurers must file a compliance report stating their compliance status with the 2016 guidelines.
The 2016 guidelines also apply to reinsurers and branches of foreign reinsurers set up in India (excluding certain specified provisions, such as the requirement to have a policyholders' protection committee (for reinsurers) and the constitution of a board and mandatory committees (for branches of reinsurers)).
By incorporating the changes introduced by the Companies Act into the 2016 guidelines, it appears that the IRDAI is seeking to place more responsibility on the management of insurers and reinsurers. Specifically, non-compliance with the provisions regarding independent directors and related-party transactions will not only make insurers liable under the Companies Act, but also the 2016 guidelines. Hence, the highly regulated nature of the insurance sector and the close scrutiny of insurer and reinsurer business operations remain significant factors for players in the Indian insurance industry.
For further information on this topic please contact Celia Jenkins or Shubhangi Pathak at Tuli & Co by telephone (+91 11 2464 0906) or email (email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org). The Tuli & Co website can be accessed at www.tuli.biz.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.