We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
10 July 2020
After the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill (CIGB) was published on 20 May 2020, it raced through the House of Commons and House of Lords and, on 26 June 2020 (in under 6 weeks) came into force as the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (CIGA), with certain of the temporary measures taking effect from 1 March 2020.
Response from the restructuring and insolvency industry was overwhelmingly positive. Even those who raised concerns with some of the detail of the proposals, couched those points in the language of support for the purpose and nature of the proposals themselves.
As well as issues raised by the industry in relation to the drafting of some of the provisions, a number of concerns were raised by the House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution in their report on the CIGB in which it noted that "The need for an urgent response to COVID-19 does not justify Parliament neglecting its duty to consider the constitutional implications of the legislation presented to it".
In particular concerns were raised with regard to: (i) the retrospective nature of a number of the temporary COVID-19 measures (such as the provisions regarding wrongful trading and statutory demands/winding up petitions) and (ii) the fast-tracking of the permanent measures in the CIGB which it considered was "inappropriate", constrained Parliamentary scrutiny and could lead to poor legislation.
In its response, however, the Government gave those concerns fairly short shrift and the only concessions made as a result related to the ability of the Secretary of State to extend temporary provisions or bring in further amendments to the legislation.
As noted, the vast majority of amendments tabled during the passage through Parliament were rejected by Government. Those that did make it into the Act include:
A wide range of amendments were tabled both in the House of Commons and in particular by the House of Lords, however, very few made it into the final legislation. Some that were proposed and rejected include:
It will be interesting to see how quickly these new provisions are utilised. The existing toolkit of measures has served the restructuring industry well for almost two decades, and the new tools are entirely untested. However, the sooner these become an integrated part of the restructuring landscape in the UK, the better.
By way of reminder, the CIGA introduces both permanent and temporary amendments to the current UK insolvency regime. The temporary measures in particular are designed to address issues arising as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and our previous article discusses these here.
For further information on this topic please contact Amy Patterson, Nick Moser, Stephen O'Grady or Luke Viner at Taylor Wessing by telephone (+44 20 7300 7000) or email (email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org). The Taylor Wessing website can be accessed at www.taylorwessing.com.
This article has been reproduced in its original format from Lexology – www.Lexology.com.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.