We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
14 July 2015
The development and growth of franchise networks rely on the availability of accessible funding. When a business is ready to expand – whether organically or through a franchise model – it requires capital either to invest in its own additional sites or to develop its franchise infrastructure, such as by writing its operations manual, preparing the necessary legal documents and implementing a franchisee recruitment programme. Similarly, prospective franchisees require funding to purchase a franchise and make the necessary initial investments in it. Restricted access to traditional sources of funding in recent years has seen a growth in alternative finance sources for new franchise businesses and ventures. In particular, there has been growth in two areas: mini-bonds and crowdfunding.
These alternative finance sources offer the franchise sector a real opportunity for growth, but it is important that both the franchisor and franchisee appreciate how they work and the potential consequences of using them.
Mini-bonds are an innovative and relatively low-cost way for UK privately owned companies to raise funds from UK investors. The corporate mini-bond market has grown dramatically in the past few years, as companies search for alternative methods to raise funds.
Key features and benefits of mini-bonds
With mini-bonds, an investor invests in a company in exchange for a bond, which is a form of loan. In return for lending money to the company, the investor receives regular interest payments and repayment of the principal sum at the end of the term of the bond. For example, a company may offer a four-year bond providing 8% interest.
Whether a franchisor or a franchisee is seeking funding, mini-bonds offer some attractive benefits over traditional funding options:
How do mini-bonds work?
Mini-bonds are small units of debt issued by a company. Subject to certain essential characteristics, the terms of the debt can be tailored to the requirements of the issuing company. They are very similar to a conventional retail bond, except they are not listed on the London Stock Exchange and are commonly not transferable.
The mini-bonds are created by way of a legal instrument and offered to the UK public by way of an 'invitation document'. Within the limits set out below, there is scope for the mini-bonds to be structured so that they suit the requirements of the issuing company. For example, the issuing company can decide on repayment terms, interest levels and whether interest will be paid in cash or by way of products or services. It is not uncommon for the issuing company to offer incentives alongside cash interest, such as credits that can be used to pay for in-store items or discounted electricity rates.
Two legal regimes apply to the bond offer: the prospectus regime and the financial promotions regime.
Mini-bonds are classed as securities. Ordinarily, any offer of transferable securities to the public requires the publication of a prospectus which has been pre-approved by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The preparation of a prospectus is a costly and time-consuming process; in order to avoid this, mini-bonds are usually non-transferable in any circumstances. Making the mini-bond non-transferable is sufficient to bring a mini-bond offer outside the prospectus regime. However, it is possible to offer transferable mini-bonds, provided that the total amount sought under the offer is restricted to less than €5 million.
Even though no prospectus is required, all communications promoting the offer will be regarded as financial promotions. Under Section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, no financial promotion may be issued unless it is issued or approved by an FCA-authorised person. It is likely that no exemption will be available in the case of a bond offer open to the general public; accordingly, an FCA-authorised person must approve the invitation document and all related promotional material as financial promotions.
If a company finds itself in a position where it must publish a prospectus, there are detailed requirements for what should be contained in the invitation document. Because mini-bond offers do not call for a prospectus, but are instead financial promotions, there is no prospectus-type list of mandatory content requirements. However, there is a general obligation that all elements of the promotion be "fair, clear and not misleading". There is some guidance as to what this phrase means, but it is largely a matter for the FCA-authorised person to determine as part of the approval process. There is no requirement to show financial information for a specific period, but the FCA-authorised person will want to ensure that there is sufficient financial information to give investors a full understanding of the business in which they are being invited to invest.
With effect from 2014, the FCA imposed additional requirements on FCA-authorised persons approving mini-bond offers. Before making a direct-offer financial promotion, authorised firms must now check that a retail investor is appropriately certified. In practice, this means that persons wishing to invest in mini-bonds must confirm that they will restrict themselves to investing only 10% of their net investible financial assets in 'non-readily realisable securities' such as mini-bonds. In addition, FCA-authorised firms must conduct an appropriateness test before allowing any of these investors to invest.
These additional requirements can be satisfied by FCA-authorised firms on an individual basis, but some crowdfunding organisations, such as Crowdcube, have built these features into their infrastructure and now offer an excellent forum for conducting mini-bond offers.
Crowdfunding is a way of raising capital from a large number of investors in relatively small amounts to fund a business, project or venture. This is often done through online platforms and can reach thousands of potential funders.
There are three principal types of crowdfunding:
Debt investors lend for financial returns by way of interest, bypassing intermediaries such as banks. The investment can be by way of mini-bonds, as described above.
Equity investors, depending on the policy of the crowdfunding platform, either receive shares in the company or contribute to a fund that invests as a nominated agent.
Key features and benefits of equity crowdfunding
Crowdfunding offers some attractive benefits to a franchise business:
How does equity crowdfunding work?
The legal framework around equity crowdfunding is very similar to that of mini-bonds, except that the companies are offering shares in themselves, rather than units of debt.
The applicable legal regimes are the same; there is a prospectus and financial promotions regime. With regards to the prospectus regime, shares are always transferable and therefore every equity crowdfunding offer must be restricted in size to less than €5 million. Thereafter, the financial promotions regime applies exactly as described above – so an invitation document must be prepared and approved by an FCA-authorised person, who will need to ensure that the document is fair, clear and not misleading and that the offer is made only to persons who satisfy the FCA's new criteria.
Differences between debt and equity crowdfunding
Debt and equity crowdfunding share many features – in particular, the relative ease and cost effectiveness with which they allow growing businesses to access finance.
However, by definition, debt fundraising calls for companies to deliver regular interest payments to investors. In order to be able to offer this, companies need to be confident that they will generate sufficient revenue to meet the interest payments, as well as repay the capital at the end of the term. This will be a key element that the FCA-authorised person will want to review as part of the approval process. This is of particular relevance to a potential franchisee considering using debt crowdfunding as a means to raise finance to acquire and fund a franchise. The franchisee must satisfy itself and the FCA-authorised person that it can afford to make the interest payments in addition to the payment of franchise fees to the franchisor. As a result, debt crowdfunding is more suited to established businesses with a track record of revenue generation on which they can base reliable forecasts. If they can meet these requirements, companies can enjoy the ability to seek any level of funding without diluting ownership of the business.
For potential franchisees or companies looking to fund their early franchise growth, equity crowdfunding may be more appropriate. With these propositions, there are no guaranteed interest or dividend payments and investors understand that capital appreciation is not guaranteed. Smaller sums can be raised and investors take a share of the ownership of the business – but this can provide vital capital at an early stage of a business's growth or when a potential franchisee is looking to raise funds needed to buy into a franchise.
The crowdfunding difference
A number of factors make crowdfunding and franchising a natural fit. For a start, crowdfunding is aimed at companies with lower investment needs (less than €5 million) – ideal for a potential franchisee or a business looking to raise sufficient capital to fund the creation of a franchise network.
It is also a great way to connect with existing and potential customers, particularly for a local franchisee. If a new franchisee is lucky enough to have a few hundred local investors funding its business, those investors provide a natural client base. It also serves to weaken the argument that franchise brands are really just big corporate players moving into local communities. This has never been the case when the franchisee is usually a local small business itself. However, having a group of local investors in the franchise can promote the sense that this business (and the brand) is local.
Not only can the local franchisee benefit from the loyalty of its investors; the brand-owning franchisor can experience a similar effect. The recent 8% four-year mini-bond issued by Mexican restaurant chain Chilango is a good illustration of the two-way relationship between funders and the brand. Investors in their 'burrito bond' are typically already fans of the brand or, if not, are likely to become so once they invest. Chilango tapped into this crossover by offering all investors two free burrito vouchers and those investing more than £10,000 received free food for the entire duration of the bond.
Crowdfunding is not without its own risks. For example, if potential franchisees can now access funds where they previously could not satisfy the banks' lending criteria, there is a risk that franchisors might accept franchisees and locations that they otherwise would not consider to be viable. Crowdfunding does not impose the same controls as traditional bank lending. Franchisees that source finance from traditional routes are required to satisfy potentially strict bank lending requirements. In contrast, crowdfunding does not impose the same controls and therefore runs the risk of allowing less prepared franchisees to enter the network. Franchisees are often driven to succeed through a realisation that their own investment is at stake. If franchisees are not investing their own money, there is always a risk that their motivation – and fear of failure – will not be as acute as those of a franchisee that has invested everything into the venture.
Finally, crowdfunding has the potential to increase the existing natural tension between franchisor and franchisee. Franchisors typically calculate their service fees based on a percentage of the franchisee's gross revenues, whereas in contrast the franchisee's focus is on net income. Crowdfunding investors share a similar perspective to the franchisee, with a focus on net income; and it is not hard to imagine the pressure that a large group of investors might exert on a franchisee to increase net income through, for example, aggressive price reductions and promotions.
Whichever route is chosen, it is becoming increasingly clear that crowdfunding has a role to play in financing growing businesses. Commentators talk in terms of 'democratising finance' – allowing new businesses to bypass traditional banks, which may not be lending to small business in the current environment, and instead reach out directly to the public. It is a fast-moving and growing area that every franchise business should consider when seeking funding for a new business idea.
For further information on this topic please contact David Bond or George Cotter at Fieldfisher by telephone (+44 20 7861 4000) or email (firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com). The Fieldfisher website can be accessed at www.fieldfisher.com.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.