We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
22 December 2016
General assessment and method
Descriptive statistics analysis
Market player behaviour
On May 8 2014 the Turkish Competition Board launched an inquiry into the cement sector. On November 2 2016 the Turkish Competition Authority published a 177-page report on the inquiry.
The report includes:
The report notes that cement production has regional hinterlands and that market entry barriers are high.
Following various complaints and investigations, the Competition Board has devoted considerable resources to the cement sector over the past five years. Particularly in the last five years, in parallel to the increased number of complaints and investigations, the Competition Authority noted an increase in administrative fines in the sector and found it necessary to conduct a sectorial inquiry.
The inquiry examined data from January 2009 to August 2014 and focused on Bulk CEM I 42.5 cement, the sector's biggest selling product. In particular, the inquiry:
In this context, the report provides information regarding:
Further, the report measures the production effectiveness of market players and compares their production effectiveness with pricing levels. As a result, the report assesses the cement sector's compliance with the expected price-effectiveness relationship.
The report provides a descriptive statistical analysis, which outlines the cement sector's structure and the market conduct of undertakings. Market structure, the conduct of undertakings and relevant competition parameters within the report's findings vary according to province, customer and product breakdown. However, these findings were consistent over the years and, within this framework, the report argues that the cement sector has a stable market structure.
The report uses the following methods to examine the behaviour of the cement sector's market players:
The price and cost analysis found that prices do not always decrease relatively in the case of cost decreases. With respect to the price and demand analysis, the report concludes that a long-term equilibrium is not found between demand and price with respect to the short-term effects. Demand was not found to affect prices in the majority of the provinces examined.
Further, the joint-pricing analysis found that cement sector prices in the period examined were generally higher than expected in markets with oligopolistic competition (excluding certain consumption points).
The efficiency and competition analysis found that:
The main competition law issues that the report highlighted are high price increases and market division.
Regarding price increases, no direct correlation was found between grey cement sale prices and economic parameters, such as seasonality, demand and cost. Further, an economic model simulation revealed that joint profit maximisation is prevalent in the sector and a correlation between efficiency and costs (ie, high efficiency levels result in lower costs). Conversely, an examination of the correlation between price and efficiency of CEM I 42.5 (45 observations) and grey cement (48 observations) found that high prices may be applied despite high efficiency levels. With regard to undertakings that operate with low efficiency levels, the report asserts that:
As regards the allocation of territories, the report found that the cement sector does not meet the expected competition levels due to the distribution of sales volumes. More than half of the cement used in the provinces is obtained from local facilities. As a result, cement distribution terminals conduct more than half of their total sales in the provinces where they are located. Further, it was found that, in general, no more than two undertakings made sales in a specific province concurrently. However, there is no indication that a price decrease results in an increase in the number of undertakings selling products in a specific province. It was found that the market shares of undertakings have been symmetric across Turkey and that approximately 50% of the Turkish cement market is held by five undertakings.
The report reveals that there is much to be done to improve competitiveness in the cement sector. Although the Competition Board continues to conduct inquiries regarding the scope of competition law and its effects, the Competition Authority has stated that promoting the potential effects that competition law could have on the sector and ensuring that this is fully comprehended by all market players is of vital importance. Therefore, the authority has indicated that the sector inquiry's results should be made available to all relevant parties, as the report allows the inquiry's methods and results to be discussed and promotes the steps required to improve competition in the cement sector.
For further information on this topic please contact Gönenç Gürkaynak at ELIG, Attorneys at Law by telephone (+90 212 327 17 24) or email (email@example.com). The ELIG, Attorneys at Law website can be accessed at www.elig.com.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.