We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
06 June 2012
The first attempt to establish an EU-wide regime for aircraft wet-leases was part of the EU Licensing of Air Carriers Regulation (2407/92). However, the regulation proved imprecise, leaving a broad scope of interpretation and powers to national civil aviation authorities. In order to remedy this situation, the European Union adopted two new sets of harmonised measures: EU Regulation 1008/2008 and EU-Ops.(1) The combination of these measures was intended to create a new, comprehensive, harmonised regime. They superseded the previous national regulations (which, in the meantime, were complemented to varying degrees by the non-binding Joint Aviation Requirements (JAR-Ops) initially enacted by the Joint Aviation Authorities).
In 1996 the Belgian Civil Aviation Authority (BCAA) enacted the Circular on the Leasing of Aircraft for Commercial Air Transport (CIR/OPS-05), which is based on EU Regulations 2407/92 and 3922/91 and certain JAR-Ops principles.
EU Regulation 1008/2008 defines a 'wet lease' as "an agreement between air carriers pursuant to which the aircraft is operated under the air operator certificate of the lessor".(2) One of the main principles introduced by the regulation is that a Community air carrier may freely lease aircraft unless this would endanger safety. Unfortunately, the text of the Belgian circular has not been amended further to the 2008 reforms. As a consequence, lease-in or lease-out arrangements involving Belgium face certain difficulties.
EU Regulation 2407/92 established a relatively strict regime regarding wet lease operations, stipulating as follows:
Thus, the regulation sets out the principle that such operations may not be authorised unless the conditions in Article 9 are met.
Regulation 1008/2008 sets out a liberalised principle whereby:
"[Community air carriers] can freely lease aircraft, except where this would lead to endangering safety. The Commission shall ensure that the implementation of such provision is reasonable and proportionate and based on safety considerations."
Thus, no limitations other than those imposed by the regulation can be applied to lease agreements to which a Community air carrier is a party.
Prior authorisation by national authorities must be granted on a proportionate and reasonable basis. A wet lease agreement can be refused only on the grounds of safety.
However, the BCAA does not comply with these principles, as the circular still provides as follows:
Pursuant to EU Regulation 1008/2008, wet lease-out operations between a Belgian lessor and a lessee that is not a Community air carrier do not require prior approval from the national authority. This is consistent with EU-Ops. Notwithstanding these provisions, which are directly applicable under Belgian law, the Belgian circular:
These provisions clearly do not comply with the terms of EU Regulation 1008/2008 and EU-Ops, and restrict the operations of Belgian carriers.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.
Pierre D Frühling