We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
15 February 2017
The Constitution, as amended in 1994, establishes consumer rights when using services and acquiring goods or receiving them for free. Law 24,240 was issued to regulate these constitutional rights.
Article 63 of Law 24,240 establishes that:
In practice, Law 24,240 applies only to claims stemming from the provision of insufficient or misleading information to passengers, consignors or consignees regarding the conditions of an air transportation contract.
Law 24,240 was modified by Congress through Law 26,361, which deleted Article 63.
The government recently vetoed this decision through Executive Decree 565/2008 for the following reasons:
ANAC Resolution 445/16 refers to the ancillary services that airlines must provide to passengers in case of delay or cancellation of a flight and modifies the previous Disposition 73/97 (for further information please see "New Civil Aviation Authority regulation").
Resolution 113/16 was issued on December 29 2016 by the Regulatory Body of the National System of Airports (ORSNA), a federal agency that controls and regulates the performance of the national airport system. It revokes ORSNA Resolution 79/10, which established a priority system for operators. Aeropuertos Argentina 2000 informed ORSNA that Jorge Newbery Airport had increased its number of operators to nine, a number which looks set to rise again. As such, Resolution 113/16 adopts the internationally recognised system of equal treatment between operators and does not give priority to any carrier, which was not previously the case.
The Ministry of Transport Resolution 485 (issued on November 11 2016) called for a public hearing to consider the petition by five operators requesting domestic and international traffic rights. The call was made in accordance with the Aeronautical Code (Law 17,285) and the requirements to obtain permits under Decree-Law 2186/92.
The call for a public hearing marked a change of ANAC policy, as no public hearing had been held during the previous decade. Consequently, the market had been monopolised by a number of carriers and Argentina's air transport system had been limited by its lack of increased capacity and expensive fares.
Resolution 485 also resulted in a public hearing procedure. The ANAC board, presided over by the ANAC president, heard the arguments of each company and the interested parties formulated their support for or opposition to each of the petitioners.
The board's decision has yet to be issued.
Law 26,993 (System of Conflict Resolution in Consumer Relations) was issued on September 19 2014. It established a conflict resolution system for consumer relationships in Buenos Aires City.
Argentine provinces and municipalities follow their own administrative procedures and a number of provinces and municipalities have offices that inform and accept claims from passengers domiciled in that area. Coprec (a consumer relations body based in Buenos Aires) also accepts claims from residents throughout Argentina.
In practice, the procedure created by Law 26,993 became operative only in 2015. As a result, Coprec and municipal offices were inundated with passenger claims against airlines in 2016.
The Coprec system operates as follows:
Law 26,993 establishes a complex administrative appeals procedure. Due to the fact that Coprec's claims process is relatively new, there are contradictory interpretations regarding the implementation of the law and procedure.
Buenos Aires has its own Citizen Participation Centre, which accepts passenger claims in each city district that has an appointed mediator; no fees are applicable. The Civil Aviation Authority (ANAC) also accepts claims by passengers, in which case the start of a summary proceeding is notified to the airline. In general, airlines file their argument within 10 working days and try to negotiate a settlement. ANAC has no administrative authority to penalise airlines.
In sum, passengers have many options to file claims and defendants (ie, airlines) have seen their legal expenses rise as a result of claims in different parts of Argentina.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.
Elizabeth Mireya Freidenberg