We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful – please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.
16 February 2017
On February 17 2011 the defendants signed a debt confirmation and guarantee agreement with the claimant. The claimant filed Admiralty Action 9/2013 against the defendants, who subsequently filed an application to set aside the action, relying on an arbitration clause in the agreement (the aforesaid application is the subject of this judgment).(1)
In order to contest the defendants' application, the claimant argued before the Supreme Court that the arbitration clause in the agreement had already been rendered inactive during the proceedings arising from General Application 430/2011, which had been filed by the defendants against the claimant before the admiralty action.
The Supreme Court on reaching its decision relied on the following facts:
The Supreme Court decided that, in light of the above, the arbitration clause had been abandoned with the consent of the claimant and the defendants, and the defendants were therefore estopped from claiming that they had not abandoned their right to activate the arbitration clause. As a result, the defendants' application to set aside Admiralty Action 9/2013 was dismissed.
For further information on this topic please contact Alex Themis at George Z Georgiou & Associates LLC by telephone (+357 22 763 340) or email (email@example.com). The George Z Georgiou & Associates website can be accessed at www.gzg.com.cy.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.